Difference between revisions of "Tariffs and Billings Systems - Experience Matrix - MATA 2009"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
m
***** (***** | *****)
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{Revision|Überarbeitungshinweis: Überführen in Übersichtstabelle im zukünftigen Finance-Portal.}}
 
{{Revision|Überarbeitungshinweis: Überführen in Übersichtstabelle im zukünftigen Finance-Portal.}}
  
−
= Results - Mata 2009<br/> =
+
= Overview<ref name="Results of the discussions during Mata 2009 (GIZ)">Results of the discussions during Mata 2009 (GIZ)</ref> =
  
−
Results of the discussions during Mata 2009 about:
 
 
*Which tariffs and billing systems have been successful?
 
*Which tariffs and billing systems have been successful?
 
*Which challenges have been identified?
 
*Which challenges have been identified?
Line 10: Line 9:
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
−
{| cellpadding="7" cellspacing="1" border="1" style="width: 98%;"
+
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="7" border="1" style="width: 100%"
 
|-
 
|-
−
| style="width: 30%;" | '''Country/Project/System'''
+
| style="width: 30%; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''Country / Project / System'''
−
| style="width: 34%;" | '''System applied successful'''
+
| style="width: 30%; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''System applied successful'''
−
| '''Challenges'''
+
| style="width: 30%;  background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''Challenges'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| <u>'''Indonesia / MHP /Micro Hydro Schemes'''</u>
 
| <u>'''Indonesia / MHP /Micro Hydro Schemes'''</u>
Line 72: Line 71:
 
*'''Multi-level tariff'''
 
*'''Multi-level tariff'''
 
#'''prepaid''' and '''post paid metered'''
 
#'''prepaid''' and '''post paid metered'''
−
#[[Tariffs#Lifeline tariff - Ghana|lifeline tariff]]
+
#[[Tariffs#Example_Ghana|lifeline tariff]]
  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 120: Line 119:
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
−
= References<br/> =
+
= Further Information<br/> =
  
−
<references />
+
*[[Portal:Financing_and_Funding|Financing and Funding Portal on energypedia]]
 +
*[[Tariffs|Tariffs]]
 +
*[[Metering_and_Billing_Systems|Metering and Billing Systems]]
  
−
<br/>
 
  
−
<br/>
 
  
−
[[Tariffs|⇒ Link to Tariffs in the Hydro Portal]]
+
= References<br/> =
  
−
[[Metering and billing systems|⇒ Link to Metering and billing systems]]
+
<references />
  
 
[[Category:Financing_and_Funding]]
 
[[Category:Financing_and_Funding]]

Latest revision as of 11:39, 6 October 2014

Maintenance: Revision needed
 This article needs to be revised. Please rewrite the article according to the specifications below. Only remove this maintenance box after a thorough revision of this article. See the discussion page for more details or start a discussion there.

In particular the following aspects and passages have been specified to be in need for a revision:
Überarbeitungshinweis: Überführen in Übersichtstabelle im zukünftigen Finance-Portal.

Overview[1]

  • Which tariffs and billing systems have been successful?
  • Which challenges have been identified?


Country / Project / System System applied successful Challenges
Indonesia / MHP /Micro Hydro Schemes
  • Communal-set tariffs
  1. Flat rate (households)
  2. Item based (eg # of bulbs)
  3. Cluster metering
  • Overloading
  • Sanction management
Pakistan
  • Item based (eg # of bulbs)
planned in Ethiopia / EnDev / Micro Hydro Schemes
  • flat rate (no productive use) + mech.load limiter; only CLF, no social tariff
  • Expected challenges:
  1. billing - recovery rate too low
  2. monitoring of applied devices
  3. Static system
  • risk: pilot --> not cost covering

Republic South Africa / SHS

Pakistan / SHS

  • Fee for service with pre-paid metering
  1. complete financial failure
  2. conceptual design resulted in no ownership and caused vandalism, theft,...

Senegal / SHS

Burkina Faso / SHS

  • Fee for service successful
Ghana / grid
  • Multi-level tariff
  1. prepaid and post paid metered
  2. lifeline tariff
China / grid - households
  • one tariff pre paid metered
Rwanda / grid
  • one tariff pre paid metered
  • power production to low for overall demand
  1. utility prefers to connect only big consumers
  • off grid tariff (MHP) lower than grid tariff
  1. not cost covering
Zambia / grid
  • recently change from flat rate to prepaid tariff
  1. resulted in lower electricity consumption
  • with reduced electricity consumption the demand for charcoal increase singnificant
Senegal / Minigrids
  • flat rate with consumption limiter
  • one tariff nationwide
  1. not cost covering under all conditions
Marocco / planned for island grid
  • load variable tariff


Further Information


References

  1. ↑ Results of the discussions during Mata 2009 (GIZ)
Retrieved from "https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Tariffs_and_Billings_Systems_-_Experience_Matrix_-_MATA_2009&oldid=85511"