Difference between revisions of "Experience with Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD)"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | '''<span style="font-size: 14pt">Experience Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD) from</span>''' some countries. | + | '''<span style="font-size: 14pt;">Experience Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD) from</span>''' some countries. |
| | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Overview''' | '''Overview''' | ||
− | <span>Polyethylene Biogas Digesters have been used repeatedly over the last 15 years. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but usage has never stopped completely. Although data about the lifespan and reliability of plastic digesters are rare, reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue. </span> | + | <span>Polyethylene Biogas Digesters have been used repeatedly over the last 15 years. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but usage has never stopped completely. Although data about the lifespan and reliability of plastic digesters are rare, reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue. </span> |
− | <span>They can just be operated properly if the farmers take care about the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers. </span> | + | <span>They can just be operated properly if the farmers take care about the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers. </span> |
<span>If they do, experiences showed that most problems are easily to handle and can be fixed by farmers.</span> | <span>If they do, experiences showed that most problems are easily to handle and can be fixed by farmers.</span> | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
<span>Below are some extracts of information collected from the project and from the Internet from experiences with plastic tube digesters in other countries</span> | <span>Below are some extracts of information collected from the project and from the Internet from experiences with plastic tube digesters in other countries</span> | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Bolivia - EnDev project == | == Bolivia - EnDev project == | ||
− | See what colleagues are doing in Bolivia: [[Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters in Bolivia|click here]]<br> | + | See what colleagues are doing in Bolivia: [[Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters in Bolivia|click here]]<br> |
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Rwanda - National Domestic Biogas Progamm == | ||
+ | |||
+ | In June 2010 NDBP reported in the R&D category that two plastic tube digesters from Kenya have been installed at ISEA at Rubirizi (Kigali) and Busogo. Feeding of the digesters is in progress. The project will collect more information on the experience in Kenya as well as with ISEA digesters to evaluate the potential of these systems for the Rwandan farmers. In line with the MoU signed between NDBP and the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (ISAE) on bio-slurry the proposal has been approved and the contract negotiation in in progress. At the ISEA compound in Rubirizi, 4 masonry digesters were installed during the training course as well as a fibre glass digester (from the 100 units purchased from China in 2008). These different digesters will be monitored by ISAE and will provide information on their performance. <br> | ||
== <br>''Vietnam''''':''' == | == <br>''Vietnam''''':''' == | ||
Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
''<span>(Presentation by Vo Lam, Takeshi Watanabe, College of Agriculture,</span>'' Cantho University. Vietnam)<span /> | ''<span>(Presentation by Vo Lam, Takeshi Watanabe, College of Agriculture,</span>'' Cantho University. Vietnam)<span /> | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
== ''Tanzania:'' == | == ''Tanzania:'' == | ||
− | <span>It is concluded that the main reasons for failure was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude. </span> | + | <span>It is concluded that the main reasons for failure was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude. </span> |
''<span>(Evaluation of small scale biogas digesters in</span>'' Turiani, Nronga and Amani, Tanzania | ''<span>(Evaluation of small scale biogas digesters in</span>'' Turiani, Nronga and Amani, Tanzania | ||
Line 35: | Line 41: | ||
by University of Aarhus, Denmark) | by University of Aarhus, Denmark) | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
== ''Honduras''''':''' == | == ''Honduras''''':''' == | ||
Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
''<span>(Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras:</span>'' Biophysical Process and Operation | ''<span>(Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras:</span>'' Biophysical Process and Operation | ||
− | ''<span>By N. Stuart Green; Montana</span>'' Tech of the Universityof Montana, 1999)<br> | + | ''<span>By N. Stuart Green; Montana</span>'' Tech of the Universityof Montana, 1999)<br> |
− | <br> | + | <br> |
== ''Kenya''''':''' == | == ''Kenya''''':''' == | ||
Line 57: | Line 63: | ||
| | ||
− | ''Based ''<span>on'' Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya, '' </span> | + | ''Based ''<span>on'' Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya, '' </span> |
− | <span>“Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006. </span> | + | <span>“Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006. </span> |
They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant. | They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant. | ||
Line 67: | Line 73: | ||
<span>-<span> </span></span>there is no reliable back-up support | <span>-<span> </span></span>there is no reliable back-up support | ||
− | <span>-<span> </span></span><span>“The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane” </span> | + | <span>-<span> </span></span><span>“The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane” </span> |
| | ||
Line 75: | Line 81: | ||
| | ||
− | <span>“Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006. </span> | + | <span>“Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006. </span> |
− | <span>The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures. </span> | + | <span>The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures. </span> |
− | <span>Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done. </span> | + | <span>Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done. </span> |
| | ||
Line 87: | Line 93: | ||
<span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.</span> | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.</span> | ||
− | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology. </span> | + | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology. </span> |
− | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption. </span> | + | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption. </span> |
− | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit. </span> | + | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit. </span> |
− | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in. </span> | + | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span><span>Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in. </span> |
<span><span>-<span> </span></span></span>There are many research needs on the technology | <span><span>-<span> </span></span></span>There are many research needs on the technology | ||
Line 103: | Line 109: | ||
<span /> | <span /> | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
== Documents on Energypedia == | == Documents on Energypedia == | ||
*[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_altiplano_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)] | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_altiplano_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)] | ||
− | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_valley_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)]<br> | + | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_valley_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)]<br> |
*[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_tropics_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Tropics Bolivia - (0 - 2.000 m above sea level)] | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_tropics_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Tropics Bolivia - (0 - 2.000 m above sea level)] | ||
*[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_comparison_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Comparison of the Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Types of GTZ / EnDev Bolivia] | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:Fact_sheet_01_2010_comparison_low-cost_polyethylene_tube_digester_bolivia.pdf Fact Sheet Comparison of the Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Types of GTZ / EnDev Bolivia] | ||
Line 114: | Line 120: | ||
*[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:How_to_install_a_polyethylenedigester_sl.pdf How to Install a polyethylene Digester] | *[http://www.energypedia.info/index.php/File:How_to_install_a_polyethylenedigester_sl.pdf How to Install a polyethylene Digester] | ||
− | <br> | + | <br> |
− | <br> | + | <br> |
[[Category:Biogas]] [[Category:Kenya]] [[Category:Honduras]] [[Category:Bolivia]] | [[Category:Biogas]] [[Category:Kenya]] [[Category:Honduras]] [[Category:Bolivia]] |
Revision as of 07:55, 16 July 2010
Experience Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD) from some countries.
Overview
Polyethylene Biogas Digesters have been used repeatedly over the last 15 years. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but usage has never stopped completely. Although data about the lifespan and reliability of plastic digesters are rare, reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue.
They can just be operated properly if the farmers take care about the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers.
If they do, experiences showed that most problems are easily to handle and can be fixed by farmers.
Below are some extracts of information collected from the project and from the Internet from experiences with plastic tube digesters in other countries
Bolivia - EnDev project
See what colleagues are doing in Bolivia: click here
Rwanda - National Domestic Biogas Progamm
In June 2010 NDBP reported in the R&D category that two plastic tube digesters from Kenya have been installed at ISEA at Rubirizi (Kigali) and Busogo. Feeding of the digesters is in progress. The project will collect more information on the experience in Kenya as well as with ISEA digesters to evaluate the potential of these systems for the Rwandan farmers. In line with the MoU signed between NDBP and the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (ISAE) on bio-slurry the proposal has been approved and the contract negotiation in in progress. At the ISEA compound in Rubirizi, 4 masonry digesters were installed during the training course as well as a fibre glass digester (from the 100 units purchased from China in 2008). These different digesters will be monitored by ISAE and will provide information on their performance.
Vietnam:
Over 30,000 Units have been installed over the past ten years in Vietnam and was widely accepted by the farmers
(Presentation by Vo Lam, Takeshi Watanabe, College of Agriculture, Cantho University. Vietnam)<span />
Tanzania:
It is concluded that the main reasons for failure was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude.
(Evaluation of small scale biogas digesters in Turiani, Nronga and Amani, Tanzania
by University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Honduras:
Polyethylene Plastic tubes must be purchased in large quantities. Need of a third party to act as a distributor to farmers.
Flooding for digesters laid in trench
(Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras: Biophysical Process and Operation
By N. Stuart Green; Montana Tech of the Universityof Montana, 1999)
Kenya:
After a false start in promoting this energy source in Kenya in the mid 1990s, it was successfully reintroduced by KARI-Embu in 2005. According to Erastus Kiruiro from KARI-Embu there are around 300 tubular digesters in use, mostly in Central Kenya but also around Nairobi
(The Organic Farmer, The Magazine for sustainable agriculture in Kenya, Nr. 45 February 2009)
Based on Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya,
“Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006.
They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant.
It has not been a successful story yet due to:
- there is no reliable back-up support
- “The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane”
It is still a promising approach which is strongly driven by KARI. Currently there are many problems and referring to the feasibility study mentioned above 4 of 5 visited plants had some technical problems but most of them could have been solved easily.
“Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006.
The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures.
Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done.
Pioneer Technologies Ltd has installed its bio-digester in various parts of the country including Nakuru, Meru, Kisumu, Kiambu, the coastal regions and the environs of Nairobi. The company has capacity to install up to 3,000 units a year, but there are several challenges including:
- Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.
- Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology.
- Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption.
- At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit.
- Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in.
- There are many research needs on the technology
Pioneer Technologies Ltd has trained 7 technicians to support the technology and at least 300 or so units have been installed country wide and despite small problems, all are now working.”
<span />
Documents on Energypedia
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Tropics Bolivia - (0 - 2.000 m above sea level)
- Fact Sheet Comparison of the Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Types of GTZ / EnDev Bolivia
- Installation manual for Low Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters
- How to Install a polyethylene Digester