Difference between revisions of "Experience with Polyethylene Biogas Digester (PBD)"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Portal:Biogas|►Back to Biogas Portal]] | ||
= Overview<br/> = | = Overview<br/> = | ||
− | + | [[Types of Biogas Digesters and Plants|Polyethylene biogas digesters]] have been used in several countries since the 1990s. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but their usage has never stopped completely. Reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue. However, dependable data about the lifespan and reliability of digester bags is rare.<br/> | |
− | + | PTDs can only function properly if the farmers take good care of the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers. If they do, experiences show that most problems are easy to handle and can be fixed by farmers themselves. | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | Below some information mainly summarized from [http://www.giz.de/en/html/index.html GIZ] projects and from the internet regarding the experiences with plastic tube digesters in different countries. | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
== Bolivia<br/> == | == Bolivia<br/> == | ||
− | + | ► See what [[Energising Development (EnDev)|GIZ EnEev]] is doing in [[Bolivia Energy Situation|Bolivia]]: [[Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters in Bolivia|Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters in Bolivia]]<br/> | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
== Honduras<br/> == | == Honduras<br/> == | ||
− | + | In [[Honduras Energy Situation|Honduras]], the distribution of polyethylene plastic tube digesters faces several problems: They must be purchased in large quantities. Need of a third party to act as a distributor to farmers. Flooding for digesters laid in trench<br/> | |
− | + | ► [http://www.sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/GREEN 2005 Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras.pdf Emerging Biodigester Technology in Honduras: Biophysical Process and Operation, N. Stuart Green; Montana Tech of the University of Montana, 1999)]<br/> | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
== Kenya<br/> == | == Kenya<br/> == | ||
− | + | After a false start in promoting this energy source in [[Kenya Energy Situation|Kenya]] in the mid 1990s, it was successfully reintroduced by KARI-Embu in 2005. According to Erastus Kiruiro from KARI-Embu there are around 300 tubular digesters in use, mostly in Central Kenya but also around Nairobi. | |
− | + | ► [http://www.infonet-biovision.org/res/res/files/2133.feb2009.pdf The Organic Farmer, The Magazine for sustainable agriculture in Kenya, Nr. 45 February 2009]<br/> | |
− | + | ► [[Plastic Tube Digesters in Kenya|Plastic Tube Digesters in Kenya]] | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | Based on Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya, “Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006. They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant.<br/> | |
<u>It has not been a successful story yet due to:</u><br/> | <u>It has not been a successful story yet due to:</u><br/> | ||
− | + | *There is no reliable back-up support. | |
− | + | *The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane. | |
− | |||
− | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | It is still a promising approach which is strongly driven by KARI. Currently there are many problems and referring to the feasibility study mentioned above 4 of 5 visited plants had some technical problems but most of them could have been solved easily. | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006.<br/> | |
− | + | The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures. | |
− | + | Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with '''Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT)'''. Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done.<br/> | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | Pioneer Technologies Ltd has installed its bio-digester in various parts of the country including Nakuru, Meru, Kisumu, Kiambu, the coastal regions and the environs of Nairobi.<br/> | |
− | + | <u>The company has capacity to install up to 3,000 units a year, but there are several challenges including:</u><br/> | |
− | * | + | *Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.<br/> |
− | * | + | *Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology.<br/> |
*<span>Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption.</span><br/> | *<span>Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption.</span><br/> | ||
− | * | + | *At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit.<br/> |
− | * | + | *Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in.<br/> |
− | * | + | *There are many research needs on the technology<br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | Pioneer Technologies Ltd has trained 7 technicians to support the technology and at least 300 or so units have been installed country wide and despite small problems, all are now working.”<br/> | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | [[File:Pioneer Biogas Technologies Kenya.JPG|center| | + | [[File:Pioneer Biogas Technologies Kenya.JPG|thumb|center|258px|Pioneer Biogas Technologies Kenya|alt=Pioneer Biogas Technologies Kenya.JPG]] |
− | '''Construction and Operation''' | + | '''Construction and Operation''': |
− | |||
− | |||
Once the trench is excavated and the materials are readily available, the construction and installation of a PTD only takes several hours. To operate a PTD, the producer has to charge it day to day with 20kg of cattle dung, mixed with 60 litres of water. After 1-2 months the digester will start producing around 4-5 hours biogas daily (for cooking and other applications such as gas lamps). Furthermore, it produces about 80 litres of ecological fertilizer daily. | Once the trench is excavated and the materials are readily available, the construction and installation of a PTD only takes several hours. To operate a PTD, the producer has to charge it day to day with 20kg of cattle dung, mixed with 60 litres of water. After 1-2 months the digester will start producing around 4-5 hours biogas daily (for cooking and other applications such as gas lamps). Furthermore, it produces about 80 litres of ecological fertilizer daily. | ||
Line 88: | Line 86: | ||
<u>Scheme of the complete tube digester system:</u> | <u>Scheme of the complete tube digester system:</u> | ||
− | + | [[File:Scheme of the biogas supply line tube digester.jpg|thumb|center|743px|Scheme of the biogas supply line tube digester|alt=Scheme of the biogas supply line tube digester.jpg]] | |
− | |||
− | [[File:Scheme of the biogas supply line tube digester.jpg|743px|Scheme of the biogas supply line tube digester | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Lessons Learnt'''<br/> | + | '''Lessons Learnt''':<br/> |
Pioneer has noted the importance of user training from the very first visit. User training therefore constitutes one of the key factors of a sustainable tube digester system. Follow up activities are also crucial: after-sales service and visits can improve obtained results considerably. Another key factor is the adequate protection of the biogas systems to achieve a satisfactory life time. To protect the tube digester against animals a wire fence is a useful option. Additionally, a roof should be installed to increase the lifetime of the digester.<br/> | Pioneer has noted the importance of user training from the very first visit. User training therefore constitutes one of the key factors of a sustainable tube digester system. Follow up activities are also crucial: after-sales service and visits can improve obtained results considerably. Another key factor is the adequate protection of the biogas systems to achieve a satisfactory life time. To protect the tube digester against animals a wire fence is a useful option. Additionally, a roof should be installed to increase the lifetime of the digester.<br/> | ||
Line 100: | Line 94: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | '''Available Pioneer Technologies''' | + | '''Available Pioneer Technologies:''' |
Until today Pioneer Technologies offers two system sizes in Kenya.<br/><br/> | Until today Pioneer Technologies offers two system sizes in Kenya.<br/><br/> | ||
− | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="height: 225px; width: 100%" | + | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="height: 225px; width: 100%" |
|- | |- | ||
− | | <br/> | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | <br/> |
− | | style=" | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''Standard size''' |
− | | style=" | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''Large size''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | '''Lay flat measurements''' | + | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | '''Lay flat measurements''' |
| 1.4 m x 10 m | | 1.4 m x 10 m | ||
| 2.6 m x 10 m | | 2.6 m x 10 m | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | '''Volume (Pioneer Indication)''' | + | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | '''Volume (Pioneer Indication)''' |
| 3 m³ | | 3 m³ | ||
| 6 m³ | | 6 m³ | ||
Line 131: | Line 125: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''L/D ratio''' | | '''L/D ratio''' | ||
− | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | 11.22 (should be between 5-10) | + | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | 11.22 (should be between 5-10) |
− | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | 6.04 (should be between 5-10) | + | | style="white-space: nowrap; width: 30%" | 6.04 (should be between 5-10) |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Total volume''' | | '''Total volume''' | ||
Line 155: | Line 149: | ||
== Rwanda<br/> == | == Rwanda<br/> == | ||
− | The National Domestic Biogas Program's (NDBP) focus in Rwanda lies on disseminating fixed dome digesters. However, rising investment costs (about 1000€ per 6 m<sup>3</sup> plant in 2011) render the technology more and more problematic in a context of severe shortage of available costumers. Therefore, polyethylene tube digesters could become a feasible economic alternative in a future energy supply scenario for Rwanda. A pilote phase launched in June 2010 with two projects (Rubinizi and Busogo) is about to clarify the potential of tube digesters for the Rwandan farmers and whether these systems can substitute fixed dome digesters. It has been agreed that the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (ISAE) is the most appropriate institution to test the PTDs. In line with the MoU signed between NDBP and the ISAE on bio-slurry the proposal has been approved and the contract negotiation is ongoing.<br/> | + | The '''National Domestic Biogas Program's (NDBP)''' focus in [[Rwanda_Energy_Situation|Rwanda]] lies on disseminating fixed dome digesters. However, rising investment costs (about 1000€ per 6 m<sup>3</sup> plant in 2011) render the technology more and more problematic in a context of severe shortage of available costumers. Therefore, polyethylene tube digesters could become a feasible economic alternative in a future energy supply scenario for Rwanda. A pilote phase launched in June 2010 with two projects (Rubinizi and Busogo) is about to clarify the potential of tube digesters for the Rwandan farmers and whether these systems can substitute fixed dome digesters. It has been agreed that the '''Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (ISAE)''' is the most appropriate institution to test the PTDs. In line with the MoU signed between NDBP and the ISAE on bio-slurry the proposal has been approved and the contract negotiation is ongoing.<br/> |
Studies on Kenya's experience with PTDs are used to further determine the feasibility of the technology for Rwanda. See PTD in Kenya<br/> | Studies on Kenya's experience with PTDs are used to further determine the feasibility of the technology for Rwanda. See PTD in Kenya<br/> | ||
Line 163: | Line 157: | ||
<u>In Rwanda, production costs for PE in different sizes with a thickness of 250 microns are estimated to be the following:</u> | <u>In Rwanda, production costs for PE in different sizes with a thickness of 250 microns are estimated to be the following:</u> | ||
− | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: | + | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" style="width: 100%" |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Lay flat width''' | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''Lay flat width''' |
− | | '''1,5 m''' | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''1,5 m''' |
− | | '''1,75 m''' | + | | style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204)" | '''1,75 m''' |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Cost for serial meter''' | | '''Cost for serial meter''' | ||
− | | 200,7 KES | + | | |
− | | 233,75 KES | + | *200,7 KES |
+ | *1499,4 RWF | ||
+ | *1,93 € | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | *233,75 KES | ||
+ | *1748,0 RWF | ||
+ | *2,25 € | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | ► [[:File:Low_Cost_Polyethylene_Tube_Digester_Rwanda.pdf|Download the report of the installation of plastic tube digesters in Rwanda]] | |
+ | |||
− | |||
== Tanzania == | == Tanzania == | ||
− | <span>It is concluded that the main reasons for failure was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude.</span> | + | <span>It is concluded that the main reasons for failure in [[Tanzania_Energy_Situation|Tanzania]] was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude.</span> |
− | + | ► [http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search/display.do?f=2000/DK/DK00026.xml;DK2000000892 Evaluation of small scale biogas digesters in Turiani, Nronga and Amani, Tanzania by University of Aarhus, Denmark]<br/> | |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 190: | Line 192: | ||
== Vietnam<br/> == | == Vietnam<br/> == | ||
− | <span>Over 30,000 | + | <span>Over 30,000 units have been installed over the past ten years in [[Vietnam_Energy_Situation|Vietnam]] and was widely accepted by the farmers</span> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 196: | Line 198: | ||
= Further Information = | = Further Information = | ||
+ | *[[Portal:Biogas|Biogas Portal on energypedia]] | ||
+ | *[[Types_of_Biogas_Digesters_and_Plants|Types of Biogas Digesters and Plants]] | ||
*[[:file:Fact sheet 01 2010 low-cost polyethylene tube digester altiplano bolivia.pdf|Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)]] | *[[:file:Fact sheet 01 2010 low-cost polyethylene tube digester altiplano bolivia.pdf|Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)]] | ||
*[[:file:Fact sheet 01 2010 low-cost polyethylene tube digester valley bolivia.pdf|Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)]]<br/> | *[[:file:Fact sheet 01 2010 low-cost polyethylene tube digester valley bolivia.pdf|Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)]]<br/> | ||
Line 201: | Line 205: | ||
*[[:file:Low cost polyethylene tube installation.pdf|Installation manual for Low Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters]] | *[[:file:Low cost polyethylene tube installation.pdf|Installation manual for Low Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters]] | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | * | + | *GIZ project experience |
− | + | ||
+ | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Tanzania]] | [[Category:Tanzania]] | ||
Line 211: | Line 217: | ||
[[Category:Honduras]] | [[Category:Honduras]] | ||
[[Category:Kenya]] | [[Category:Kenya]] | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Vietnam]] | [[Category:Vietnam]] | ||
[[Category:Bolivia]] | [[Category:Bolivia]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Biogas]] |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 14 November 2014
Overview
Polyethylene biogas digesters have been used in several countries since the 1990s. In some areas they have been abandoned after unsuccessful introduction but their usage has never stopped completely. Reports show that the lifespan of the plastic tubes is always a main issue. However, dependable data about the lifespan and reliability of digester bags is rare.
PTDs can only function properly if the farmers take good care of the digesters. This needs intensive training and raised responsibility amongst the farmers. If they do, experiences show that most problems are easy to handle and can be fixed by farmers themselves.
Below some information mainly summarized from GIZ projects and from the internet regarding the experiences with plastic tube digesters in different countries.
International Experience with Polyethylene Tube Digesters
Bolivia
► See what GIZ EnEev is doing in Bolivia: Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters in Bolivia
Honduras
In Honduras, the distribution of polyethylene plastic tube digesters faces several problems: They must be purchased in large quantities. Need of a third party to act as a distributor to farmers. Flooding for digesters laid in trench
Kenya
After a false start in promoting this energy source in Kenya in the mid 1990s, it was successfully reintroduced by KARI-Embu in 2005. According to Erastus Kiruiro from KARI-Embu there are around 300 tubular digesters in use, mostly in Central Kenya but also around Nairobi.
► The Organic Farmer, The Magazine for sustainable agriculture in Kenya, Nr. 45 February 2009
► Plastic Tube Digesters in Kenya
Based on Promoting Biogas Systems in Kenya, “Pioneer Technologies” (a Kenyan plastic company) has built 200 plants since 2006. They improved the plastic tubes to be better sun and pressure resistant.
It has not been a successful story yet due to:
- There is no reliable back-up support.
- The digester seems to suffer from effects of variable temperature, and there is a possibility that the heat catalyses some reactions that produce other volatile gases as well as methane.
It is still a promising approach which is strongly driven by KARI. Currently there are many problems and referring to the feasibility study mentioned above 4 of 5 visited plants had some technical problems but most of them could have been solved easily.
Development of the plastic tubular technology was initiated in August 2006.
The Plastic Tubular bio-digesters are designed for households with two to three animals although bigger ones have been installed. Capacity of the former is about 8-9 m3, with a gas holding chamber of 1-3 m3. A larger one that doubles this size has already been installed. The smaller Plastic Tubular Bio-digesters can give gas for six hours using one burner. Methane production is initially dependent on temperatures.
Currently, Pioneer Technologies Ltd receives support from Land O’lakes and has entered into research collaboration with Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT). Land O’Lakes gives financial support to the company in the production of biogas digesters. JKUAT is supposed to carry out investigations into issues arising from the use of the technology, with focus on how the technology can be improved, made more efficient etc. However, Pioneer Technologies Ltd gave the JKUAT one digester only, and so the university should acquire more digesters for any meaningful research to be done.
Pioneer Technologies Ltd has installed its bio-digester in various parts of the country including Nakuru, Meru, Kisumu, Kiambu, the coastal regions and the environs of Nairobi.
The company has capacity to install up to 3,000 units a year, but there are several challenges including:
- Most households need some financial support to acquire the technology. At cost, a Plastic Tubular Bio-digester goes for €322 only. However, this excludes the cost of transport – and so areas further away from Nairobi pay more money. In Meru, users paid up to €399. The cost of the technology, though coming down is prohibitive to most farmers, although when financial and economic analyses are made, especially taking into account opportunity costs vis a vis other energy technologies, it is very likely that bio-digesters will be economical and profitable.
- Training of technicians to support the technology is costly. Not all technicians trained will work on the digesters forever, some move on. There is need for the technology to be supported by some form of extension. Regular visits to households that have installed it are critical for longevity, good use and success of the technology.
- Many people are not aware of the existence of the technology, or if aware, do not have adequate information on how the technology actually works. This is a hindrance to large-scale adoption.
- At times, the technology fails because of unmet expectations. Even the Plastic Tubular Bio-digester has some technical problems – and these need to be sorted out. Without a reliable back-up support, small problems can lead potential users to shun away from it. But companies like Pioneer Technology Ltd cannot afford to have an extension/back-up support team because it already charges very low figures to install a unit.
- Users need to be trained, and this is quite costly. This is where organisations like Land O’Lakes come in.
- There are many research needs on the technology
Pioneer Technologies Ltd has trained 7 technicians to support the technology and at least 300 or so units have been installed country wide and despite small problems, all are now working.”
Construction and Operation:
Once the trench is excavated and the materials are readily available, the construction and installation of a PTD only takes several hours. To operate a PTD, the producer has to charge it day to day with 20kg of cattle dung, mixed with 60 litres of water. After 1-2 months the digester will start producing around 4-5 hours biogas daily (for cooking and other applications such as gas lamps). Furthermore, it produces about 80 litres of ecological fertilizer daily.
Scheme of the complete tube digester system:
Lessons Learnt:
Pioneer has noted the importance of user training from the very first visit. User training therefore constitutes one of the key factors of a sustainable tube digester system. Follow up activities are also crucial: after-sales service and visits can improve obtained results considerably. Another key factor is the adequate protection of the biogas systems to achieve a satisfactory life time. To protect the tube digester against animals a wire fence is a useful option. Additionally, a roof should be installed to increase the lifetime of the digester.
Available Pioneer Technologies:
Until today Pioneer Technologies offers two system sizes in Kenya.
Standard size | Large size | |
Lay flat measurements | 1.4 m x 10 m | 2.6 m x 10 m |
Volume (Pioneer Indication) | 3 m³ | 6 m³ |
Weight | 24 kg | 45 kg |
Volume Calculation | ||
D | 0.89 m | 1.66 m |
L/D ratio | 11.22 (should be between 5-10) | 6.04 (should be between 5-10) |
Total volume | 6.24 m³ | 21.52 m³ |
Liquid volume | 4.67 m³ | 16.14 m³ |
Gasholder volume | 1.56 m³ | 5.38 m³ |
Cost of installed digester | 24,200 KES (233 Euro) | 33,800 KES (325 Euro) |
Rwanda
The National Domestic Biogas Program's (NDBP) focus in Rwanda lies on disseminating fixed dome digesters. However, rising investment costs (about 1000€ per 6 m3 plant in 2011) render the technology more and more problematic in a context of severe shortage of available costumers. Therefore, polyethylene tube digesters could become a feasible economic alternative in a future energy supply scenario for Rwanda. A pilote phase launched in June 2010 with two projects (Rubinizi and Busogo) is about to clarify the potential of tube digesters for the Rwandan farmers and whether these systems can substitute fixed dome digesters. It has been agreed that the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (ISAE) is the most appropriate institution to test the PTDs. In line with the MoU signed between NDBP and the ISAE on bio-slurry the proposal has been approved and the contract negotiation is ongoing.
Studies on Kenya's experience with PTDs are used to further determine the feasibility of the technology for Rwanda. See PTD in Kenya
In Rwanda, production costs for PE in different sizes with a thickness of 250 microns are estimated to be the following:
Lay flat width | 1,5 m | 1,75 m |
Cost for serial meter |
|
|
► Download the report of the installation of plastic tube digesters in Rwanda
Tanzania
It is concluded that the main reasons for failure in Tanzania was insufficient training of farmers and insufficient follow up by Surude.
Vietnam
Over 30,000 units have been installed over the past ten years in Vietnam and was widely accepted by the farmers
Further Information
- Biogas Portal on energypedia
- Types of Biogas Digesters and Plants
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Altiplano Bolivia - (3.000 - 4.500 m above sea level)
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Valley Bolivia - (2.000 - 3.000 m above sea level)
- Fact Sheet Low-Cost Polyethylene Tube Digester Tropics Bolivia - (0 - 2.000 m above sea level)
- Installation manual for Low Cost Polyethylene Tube Digesters
References
- GIZ project experience