Difference between revisions of "Metering and Billing Systems"
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
= Overview = | = Overview = | ||
| Line 121: | Line 120: | ||
*[[Metering and Billing Battery Charging Systems (BCS)|Metering and Billing Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]<br/> | *[[Metering and Billing Battery Charging Systems (BCS)|Metering and Billing Battery Charging Systems (BCS)]]<br/> | ||
*[[Net Metering|Net Metering]]<br/> | *[[Net Metering|Net Metering]]<br/> | ||
| − | *[[ | + | *[[Brazil - Net Metering)|Brazil - Net Metering)]]<br/> |
| Line 129: | Line 128: | ||
<references /><br/> | <references /><br/> | ||
| + | [[Category:Feed-in_Tariffs]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Electricity]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Net_Metering_Brazil]] | ||
[[Category:Net_Metering]] | [[Category:Net_Metering]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:39, 8 December 2014
Overview
Net metering is a service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by that electric consumer from an eligible on-site generating facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provided by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period.[1]
Billing
Organising electricity distribution requires to determine:
- how much electricity is available
- how it is shared and limited
- how are the individual costs (tariffs) to be set
Different Tariff systems are practicable at different conditions:
(see also at Costs and Tariff Setting - Examples)
- Flat tariffs unlimited/limited
- Item based tariffs (pay per bulb/TV/Radio)
- Pay per usage (requires metering)
Standard kWh Meter
Advantages
- technique is "state of the art"
- billing is fair and transparent
- reading can be uncoupled from tariff collection
- allows amount and time related tariffs (demand steering)
Disadvantages
- high costs (metering device)
- especially at rural areas in dev. countries the investment cost for a meter unit are way out of range
- dis- and re-connection in case of late payment
Pre-paid System with Coins or Cards
Advantages
- fair and transparent
- no meter reading
- no overdue costs
- no costs for dis- and re-connection
- close to “ability to pay”-variations
- coins less expensive than cards
Disadvantages
- relatively high cost for metering device
- less forgery proof
- costs for re-collection of coins and selling system for coins/cards
Current Limiter / Fuses
.jpg)
Advantages
- simultaneously protecting against overcurrent (actual purpose)
- cheap if simple versions
- no meter reading required => indirect power flat rate according to max. amperage
Disadvantages
- accuracy of cicuit breakers as load limiter fluctuates (even items from one batch have different trigger levels)
=> neigbours with same connections may be able to use different wattage - fault current breaker are rarely available in < 1 Ampere range (1 A / 220 V => 220 Watt)
- time of usage not considered; less fair
- melting fuses are available and cheap but very easy to bridge (also temporarily) => encourage misuse
Flat Rate / No Metering / No Limiting
Only in well organised small communities a flat rate without limiting or metering will work. Consumers have to agree that everybody connected carries the same share of payment. If usage of electricity differs widely between the connected parties usually the "one tariff for all" is considered unfair.
Often such settings work only until the limit of the mhp is reached and power has to be rationed.
Advantages
- very cheap (no metering or limiting device)
- in rural areas of Indonesia common and accepted as long lighting is the common/only usage
- can be combined with number of appliances or installed wattage (social control)
Disadvantages
- provokes waste of electricity, no incentive for saving
- no load control / demand steering possible (peaks)
- can be unfair
Further Information
