Difference between revisions of "SPIS Toolbox - Contract Supplier"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{SPIS Design}} {{Back to SPIS Toolbox}} | + | {{SPIS Design}} |
| + | {| cellpadding="1" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Back to Design}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Next Chapter}}[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Select_Suitable_Installer|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">Contract Supplier</span>''' === | + | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">9. Contract Supplier</span>''' === |
In a final step, the best system provider needs to be selected based on cost-quality considerations. In a meeting of the producer, the agricultural service provider and the shortlisted candidates, the following topics should be addressed: | In a final step, the best system provider needs to be selected based on cost-quality considerations. In a meeting of the producer, the agricultural service provider and the shortlisted candidates, the following topics should be addressed: | ||
| Line 44: | Line 52: | ||
==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' ==== | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' ==== | ||
| − | *Quotations/offers often deviate from technical specifications; | + | *Quotations / offers often deviate from technical specifications; |
*Significant differences exist between bidders in terms of services and warranty. | *Significant differences exist between bidders in terms of services and warranty. | ||
*Implementation scheduling needs to be firm and agreed upon. | *Implementation scheduling needs to be firm and agreed upon. | ||
*Negotiate with the supplier. | *Negotiate with the supplier. | ||
{{SPIS Reference}} | {{SPIS Reference}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| cellpadding="1" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Back to Design}} | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | {{Next Chapter}}[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Select_Suitable_Installer|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> | ||
| + | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 21 July 2020
| ►Back to the Start Page | ►Back to the Module Page | ►Go to the Next Chapter |
9. Contract Supplier
In a final step, the best system provider needs to be selected based on cost-quality considerations. In a meeting of the producer, the agricultural service provider and the shortlisted candidates, the following topics should be addressed:
- detailed presentation of offer and the SPIS experience by provider;
- explanation of design procedure and tools to be used (e.g. computer-based sizing);
- product quality and safety certificates;
- warranty, after-sale services and spare part supply (e.g. maintenance contracts);
- final negotiation on price, if required;
- implementation schedule;
- contract details and payment conditions.
The contract should only be concluded once all open questions have been clarified.
In the negotiations with the supplier it is important to:
- define your goals;
- identify negotiation areas;
- look for win-win situations;
- make realistic proposals;
- clear up misunderstandings;
- make a final summary.
Outcome/Product
- Ultimate quality provider with the best cost-quality ratio;
- Supply contract, including after- sale services.
Data Requirements
- Technical and financial quotations / offers;
- Shortlisted candidates;
- Structured comparison of qualified bids;
- Clarification of open questions during negotiation.
People/Stakeholders
- Producers;
- Agricultural service providers;
- Suppliers / system integrators.
Important Issues
- Quotations / offers often deviate from technical specifications;
- Significant differences exist between bidders in terms of services and warranty.
- Implementation scheduling needs to be firm and agreed upon.
- Negotiate with the supplier.
| ►Back to the Start Page | ►Back to the Module Page | ►Go to the Next Chapter |
